A bitter High Court dispute has broken out in between future neighbours about the construction of the wall at a coastal internet site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a situation that has attracted countrywide focus adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Occasions article about René Collier and also the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has progressed into a extremely publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, look for to build their family household. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes alongside Eire’s coastline, where by development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established citizens. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining created by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted under setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their arranging permission by creating a wall further than the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result places are subject matter to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments might have lasting ecological implications, notably inside of a delicate coastal setting for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach in their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper placement. Their legal staff has characterised the action being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their see, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of many coastal organizing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are the two extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In line with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waist-superior h2o during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which includes given that turn into emblematic of your intensity of your dispute. These steps weren't basically symbolic; they were being meant to Get visual evidence of your wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location within the sea Irish Moments described, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o during serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the site turned Among the most placing descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Moments report about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that such steps have been cited to show the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument which the SAC was being encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been included intimately because of the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Periods January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as readers sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further more submissions on no matter if interim orders needs to be granted to halt development pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the lawful timeline.
For the core in the dispute is often a disagreement above boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain which the wall, as built, goes further than what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that this is Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been described as meticulous in his evaluation of organizing paperwork, maps, and problems hooked up to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is determined by concern for environmental security and adherence to setting up legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving a private watch, insisting alternatively that it is about guaranteeing that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their long-standing connection to the area as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only trying to create a spouse and children dwelling in accordance Using the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Special Space of Conservation and say that all performs are actually completed depending on Expert advice and authorized plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean during a storm, usually do not alter the underlying specifics.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that a lot of observers see as increasingly typical. As sea amounts increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Moments posting about René Collier noted the businessman had Beforehand been involved in regional advocacy on setting up and environmental issues, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very distinctive Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning from your sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of midsection-significant water through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting the two the physical truth of the coastline as well as symbolic character from the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome continues to be uncertain. The court docket have to establish whether or not the wall as created complies with arranging authorization and irrespective of whether any encroachment into a Particular Location of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and scheduling ailments. However the human factor continues to be central: neighbours who must Dwell alongside one another lengthy after the authorized charges have been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building performs at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. It also underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential problems which include environmental security and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved legal issues. Regardless of whether it'll finally be altered, eradicated, or finished as planned will depend on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably keep on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent years.